This research emphasizes on the methodology of al-Imam Ibn cAshur in communicating with the prophetic traditions (ahadith) in al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. This research is based on the analytical study and critical approach. The analytical study is focused on three main points. Firstly, the biography of Ibn cAshur and an introduction to his book al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. Secondly, the explanation of Ibn cAshur's stand on the most important discussions of Sunnah: Hujjiyyat al-Sunnah, Istiqlaliyyat al-Sunnah fi al-Tashric, Tawdih al-Sunnah li al-Qur'an, al-Ishkal fi al-Hadith and his stand regarding al-Ahadith al-Mutacaridah wa al-Mutawafiqah. Thirdly, the explanation of Ibn cAshur's methodology in communicating with the most important discussions of Hadith; al-Istidlal, al-Takhrij, al-Hukm cala al-Hadith and Sharh al-Hadith. As for the critical approach, this research undergoes the practical side of al-Takhrij by verifiying the prophetic traditions (ahadith) in al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir in order to reclaim its sources and its authenticity. In conclusion, some important facts are found. First, the book of al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir includes both Tafsir bi al-Ma'thur and Tafsir bi al-Ra'y. Second, Ibn cAshur was an Ashcariyy in faith and a Malikiyy in fiqh, but he still upheld the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. and was humble in discussions and debates. Third, Ibn cAshur some times verified the prophetic traditions (ahadith) that he had in his book al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. This noble action is especially rare in most of the current books of Tafsir. Finally, the book of al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir, like any other books, contains some non-acceptable prophetic traditions (ahadith) but they are small in number compared to the large volumes of prophetic traditions (ahadith). This fact does give its readers and researcher a sense of relief.

This thesis dealt with the study of a newly printed manuscript in the area of linguistic interpretation, which is a summary of the Al-Mukhtaṣar of Al-Samῑn Al- Ḥalabῑ in the syntax of the Holy Qur'an by ’Abd Raḥman Al-Tinilanῑ. The importance of this book lies in being a summary of the interpretation of Al-Durr Al-Maṣūn by Al-Samῑn Al- Ḥalabῑ. It is troublesome not with standing the extent of the scientific legacy in the field of linguistic interpretation; it involves problems, including the repetition of the interpreters of what their predecessors said. This makes it challenging to research the interpretational technique and analyze the additional facts among them. An additional facet of the issues pertains to the prevalence of numerous weak viewpoints regarding the syntax, vocabulary definitions, and validity of the reasons for revelation and interpretation. It also involves the commentators' obsession with disproving the claims made by their opponents while engaging in the least amount of ethical debate with one another because their doctrinal, linguistic, or jurisprudential theories differ. The Mukhtaṣar AlSamῑn researchers' author suggested that, depending on the parts of interpretation they are more interested in, they could potentially benefit from preexisting interpretations as needed. This method can be abandoned due to the needs of modern scholars who might become perplexed by the vast amount of interpretation without having access to all the information. The study reached results that can be summarized as follows: Due to the loss of numerous books and manuscripts, the interpretation of Al-Durr Al-Maṣūn is a crucial source of information in the chapter on grammarians' sayings, famous and unusual Quranic readings, and the numerous poetic evidence found within. One particularly noteworthy example of this is the interpretation of Al-Samῑn Al-Ḥalabῑ due to the loss of a great deal of books and manuscripts. The statement about the usefulness of the Mukhtassar Al-Samῑn’s abbreviation in making the compilation easier by making it smaller in size, eliminating any grammatical errors, including it in the vocabulary list, and suggesting potential translations of passages from the Quran. It also states possible estimates of the Quranic verses, and the mention of derivation of the word and the stages of the changing of its structures. By employing the method of thematic interpretation, it begins by looking up the definition of a word in the surah of the Qur'an, before referring it the dictionaries. All of this contributes to the differentiation of Al-Tinilanῑ’s approach to interpretation, as the fundamental goals of the study are represented. The message ultimately encourages scholars to carry out further research into the meanings of the Qur'an, attempt to apply it to our reality, and make use of contemporary instruments and scientific research. It also refers to its features and additions in the heritage construction related to linguistic interpretation of the Qur’an.