Publication: The responsibility and independence of shari`ah advisors and the shari`ah review process in the Indonesian Islamic banks
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Subject LCSH
Banks and banking -- Indonesia -- Religious aspects -- Islam
Subject ICSI
Call Number
Abstract
The Islamic bank (lB) requires an independent and credible body which ensures that a1l of the IBs activities and transactions are in accordance with Shari
ah principles. Despite the present rules and guidelines developed by National Shariah Council - Indonesian
Ulama Council (NSC-lUC) and Bank Indonesia, there is a lack of sufficient guidelines related to the existence of Shariah Advisors (SAs) in Islamic banks (IBs) in Indonesia. Therefore, this study is designed to examine the perceptions of IBs managers and SAs of IBs in Indonesia on the responsibility and independence of SAs, and the Sharf
ah review process. The study utilizes questionnaires to obtain the perceptions of IB managers while it uses interview to obtain the perceptions of SAs of lBs in Indonesia. There are 67 IB managers and 5 SAs of IBs in Indonesia who are actively involved as the respondents of the study. The study shows that the respondents perceived that the SAs are responsible for ensuring that the products, contracts and transactions of IBs are in compliance with Shartah prindples. In order· to improve the independence of SAs, the respondents viewed that the SAs should be proh1bited from becoming consultants and majority shareholders of the IBs for the same IBs in which they act as SAs. The respondents also perceived that the SAs should conduct a Shariah review based on a sampling method. After conducting a Shari
ah review, the respondents were of the opinion that SAs should prepare a Sharfah review report published in the annual report for the shareholders. In addition the respondents also viewed that SAs should prepare a special Shari
ah review report for the directors, regulators (e.g. Bank Indonesia) and the NSC-IUC. Furthermore, the study indicates that there are some significant differences between the perceptions of Islamic Commercial Bank (ICB) and Conventional Bank that offers an Islamic banking scheme (CBI) on certain aspects related to the responsibility and independence of SAs and the Shari` ah review process in the IBs in Indonesia.